Re: Standard codes (out of topic !?)
From Neil Franklin <nei...@franklin.ch.remove>
· alt.ascii-art
· 12 Feb 2000 00:00 · View full thread
"Meph" <UZS...@uni-bonn.de> writes: > > 1963 ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange) > - specified as 7-bit code for telecommunication and data exchange > - 100 of 128 positions are used (only upper case) Prepend this with: U.S./AT&T Teletype code. Existant at least in 1953 (I have used a device built then). Had 64 printable characters (codes 32-95) identical with todays ASCII with a few substitution (no. 95 (_) was then a leftwards facing arrow, no. 94 (^) was an actual upwards facing arrow, possibly others I do not know of). > 1965 ECMA-6 (European National Standards Institute, Genf) European Computer Manufacturers Association, actually. ENSI does not exist, there exists an ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute you may be confusing this with. > 1981 IBM Codepage 437 > - IBM uses the 8 bit and extended the code to 256 positions 8 bit, but neither a predecessor to ISO-8859 (that is why DOS texts make such a mess on Usenet), nor the first 8bit code. The honour of both of those goes AFAIK to an DEC character set from the mid/late 1970s (VT52 or VT100 terminal character set). > 1986 ISO 8859-1, called Latin-1 > - it becomes international standard > - identically with IBM Codepage 819 and 850 More likely those IBM Codepages are the names of their ISO implementations. > - used in Windows with some additional characters Particulartly 128-159, which are empty in ISO, but also quite a few other random changes that foul up 8bit exchanges (that is why Windows texts make such a mess on Usenet). > (it exists no code called ANSI !) The name ANSI properly refers to a set of terminal control codes (function key reporting, cursor positioning, font switsching etc) derived from the DEC VT100 terminal code. What is today often misscalled ANSI is the PC/MS-DOS character set, which is actually pure IBM Codepage 437. > 1987 Unicode (UCS) > - developed by Apple and Xerox Actually derived from an Xerox character set, with additions by Apple and others. > - at the moment only used by Windows NT and Java And Linux (as alternative to ISO8859-1, the default). > 1992 ISO/IEC 10646-1 > - it becomes international standard Actually ISO10646 is a 32 bit code with Unicode as its codes 0-65535. Also ISO10646 defines UTF-8, a coding that uses single bytes. 1 byte for chars 0-127 (= ASCII), 2 bytes for 128-2047, 3 bytes for 2048-65535 ... until max 6 bytes. -- Neil Franklin, nei...@franklin.ch.remove http://neil.franklin.ch/ Nerd, Geek, Hacker, Unix Wizzard, Sysadmin, Roleplayer, Mystic Computer: a toy, speeds work so that you have more time to play
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,4f3c981b56494d92 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Neil Franklin <nei...@franklin.ch.remove> Subject: Re: Standard codes (out of topic !?) Date: 2000/02/12 Message-ID: <6uw...@chonsp.franklin.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 585097042 References: <883uu3$1he2$1...@f1node01.rhrz.uni-bonn.de> X-Complaints-To: new...@chonsp.franklin.ch X-Trace: 12 Feb 2000 22:31:54 +0100, dua131221.dialup800-stat.ethz.ch Organization: My own Private Self NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Feb 2000 21:30:09 GMT Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.