Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from de.alt.rec.ascii-art, 2 Dec 2000.
[REQ] Einen Hasen für die Sig

[REQ] Einen Hasen für die Sig

Moin!

Ich suche einen Ascii-Hasen f�r meine Signature. Da ich k�nstlerisch
v�llig untalentiert bin, hoffe ich da� hier jemand Zeit, Lust,
Laune, Gelegenheit und ein Tatmotiv hat meine Signature ein wenig zu
bereichern. Oder vielleicht wei� jemand eine URL wo ich vielleicht
f�ndig werde?

TIA,


  -kfk

-- 
This line is not left unintentionally unblank.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: GERMAN,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: f7c81,b42cbd7ceb1de067,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7c81,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-02 10:14:45 PST
Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!194.8.194.95!news.netcologne.de!not-for-mail
From: Klaus Fabritius <kf...@wasserhase.de>
Newsgroups: de.alt.rec.ascii-art
Subject: [REQ] Einen Hasen =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= die Sig
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:13:32 +0000
Organization: Heimat der Wasserhasen
Lines: 15
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <c4e...@mid.wasserhase.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-194-8-205-201.netcologne.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.netcologne.de 975780883 22468 194.8.205.201 (2 Dec 2000 18:14:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abu...@netcologne.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Dec 2000 18:14:43 GMT
Xref: supernews.google.com de.alt.rec.ascii-art:205
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup de.alt.rec.ascii-art in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post