Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 22 Jun 1999.
Re: A typical day in pond CIWAH

Re: A typical day in pond CIWAH

>Message-id: <376...@gtcom.net>

>That was such a cute cartoon,it made me smile.Who did the ascii
>in it?Who ever they were,they are special.

Well, if you check out my website, all
of the ducks were made by me... and
guess what?  they ALL had my initials
stripped off of them.   How rude.  I guess
someone did not read my simple
'guidelines for use' at:
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/7373/please.htm
or just has no common sense to credit 
people whose work they used.
Perhaps both.

-joan
-- 
          ,        ,
         /(_,    ,_)\          DON'T MESS WITH ME...
         \ _/    \_ /          I'M A REAL CRAB TODAY!
         //        \\
         \\ (@)(@) //          joan stark
          \'="=="='/           spu...@juno.com
      ,===/        \===, 
     ",===\        /===,"      ASCII art gallery:
     " ,==='------'===, "      http://www.ascii-art.com
jgs   "                "

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,94d6bb5eb1d9cdae
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: spu...@aol.comQQ (Spunk1111)
Subject: Re: A typical day in pond CIWAH
Date: 1999/06/22
Message-ID: <199...@ng-ce1.aol.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 492551757
References: <376...@gtcom.net>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
X-Admin: new...@aol.com
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1999 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post