Re: ASCII Art Fart for Sun, 2005 Jan 2

Sharky wrote:

> In <343...@individual.net>, Zotiel R. Bell wrote:
> 
>>Are diddles OK fer ObASCII?
>>What about straight JavE conversions?
> 
> Yes and Yes.
> 
>>MOST of my work is diddled from someone else, I also tend to not do all that
>>much of it any more so getting NEW things is rather difficult at times. I do
>>like the idea of Obligatory Art posted as it does cause most OFF-topic posts be
>>a (at least a bit) on-topic. I often try to use my older work when I remember to
>>add an ObASCII to a post if I've nothing new to share. The last few I've used
>>were some of my oldest work just re-arranged a bit...If I've nothing new to
>>share I figure it's better to re-post some older work rather then share nothing
>>at all, but if it's better to not have ASCII in a post then re-post I'll stop.
> 
> Please continue to post all the ascii-art you can.  Your view on
> ObAscii and 'diddles' is entirely in sink with the traditions and
> spirit of this group.  Creative ascii-art should not be so limited
> that it excludes recompilation of peoples work, most especially when
> the original artist is credited for their contribution.  If people
> feel they should only post completely original art, then good for
> them, there are no such limitations for the rest of us.

"rest of us" - are you speaking on mine and others behalf?

Or bequarter?

            (0000000000000000) _ (00000000000000000000)
                              / \
                              ^^^

                    -------===========--------
                                     `
                                      "Show us to leader
                                       yours please
                                       now no thankyou!"

-- 
ABCGi - Atomic                             ______________________
<===>   Bacterial  Genetic                |---------------------||
         Chemical   Infantrymen <=========== http://abcgi.fly.to =-+-=>
                                           |---------------------|'