Re: Req: Shark or Classical Guitar
From Veronica Karlsson <e93...@nospam.sm.luth.se>
· alt.ascii-art
· 12 Jun 1997 00:00 · View full thread
· report
Jan Lipponen wrote: > > : Right, I want a ascii shark or classical guitar. > > Here's a shark (sort of anyway). I couldn't fit it into 4 lines but > maybe someone else can do better. > > .~(_ ,.- > _..,---~ ~--,..___.,-~- > <___,;,, ___,.,__ ( > ~~-. -~~ ~-. > \( JLi > . (!) \_____)\_____ / /--v____ __\`) O______ )/ _// \_ ` ' ' ` (I wonder if the shark is hungry...) (yum!) . / \_____)\_____ /--v____ __`<______ )/ _// \_ ` ' ' ` (mmm!) . / \_____)\_____ /--v____ __\`) )/ /\_ ' \ ` ' (burp!) . / \_____)\_____ /--v____ __`< )/ ' -- :) Veronica Karlsson ( e93...@sm.luth.se http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ) ( llizard's fanclub: http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/llpages )
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,e84dd7f5c2fd4ba4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Veronica Karlsson <e93...@nospam.sm.luth.se> Subject: Re: Req: Shark or Classical Guitar Date: 1997/06/12 Message-ID: <33A...@nospam.sm.luth.se>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 247918525 References: <adr...@lab2-148.cs.waikato.ac.nz> <5nok8h$pm7$1...@ousrvr3.oulu.fi> Organization: Junk e-mail gladly reported (I have got credit for chucking several spammers out of their accounts) Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.