Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 19 Nov 2001.
Re: Ansi Art Signatures Wanted...

Re: Ansi Art Signatures Wanted...

> He has some initials on. Likely they were lost by the time he found
> the ascii art. I see a few of Joan's and some others I know.

I didn't even see the original post .. I'm guessing he posted in HTML - My
server filters out all kinds of junk including htmlposts

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b3a485fb77b1d9f1
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-19 02:50:59 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.162.153.118!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail
From: "CeeJay" <use...@ceejay.cjb.NOSPAMnet>
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
References: <taUI7.2576$FE2...@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> <3BF...@xs4all.nl> <3BF...@hotmail.com> <rqj...@4ax.com> <3BF...@xs4all.nl> <e4p...@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Ansi Art Signatures Wanted...
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:51:38 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <3bf8e413$0$752$edf...@dspool01.news.tele.dk>
Organization: TDC Internet
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.62.219.116
X-Trace: 1006167059 dread04.news.tele.dk 752 80.62.219.116
X-Complaints-To: abu...@post.tele.dk
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:10936
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post