Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from de.alt.rec.ascii-art, 27 Nov 2000.
Re: korpulierende hamster ;)

Re: korpulierende hamster ;)

rob...@vermtech.de (Robert Kuhn) wollte folgendes der �ffentlichkeit
nicht vorenthalten:

>> Danke :)  (obwohl es mir noch nicht so riesig gef�llt, da ich es
>> einigerma�en schnell hingekleistert hab
>Super, das hei�t also, wir sehen bald Version 1.1?

Hm, nay. Bin selbst zu faul dazu, aber ihr k�nnt ruhig diddeln was das
Zeug h�lt ;)

benjamin

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: GERMAN,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: f7c81,fbb8a18a5dbc9468
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7c81,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-11-27 09:24:08 PST
Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!p3ee0d565.dip.t-dialin.NET!not-for-mail
From: ben...@uloc.de (Benjamin Weiland)
Newsgroups: de.alt.rec.ascii-art
Subject: Re: korpulierende hamster ;)
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 17:21:52 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <3a2...@news.cis.dfn.de>
References: <3a2...@news.cis.dfn.de> <8FF...@vermtech.de> <3a2...@news.cis.dfn.de> <8FF...@vermtech.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p3ee0d565.dip.t-dialin.net (62.224.213.101)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 975345846 5811817 62.224.213.101 (16 [7648])
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: supernews.google.com de.alt.rec.ascii-art:157
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup de.alt.rec.ascii-art in 2000 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post