Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from rec.arts.ascii, 9 Feb 1995.
Question: Use of figlet in emacs?

Question: Use of figlet in emacs?

From Rem...@imag.fr · rec.arts.ascii · 9 Feb 1995 08:25 · View full thread · report
Hello

It seems to me that I saw in this group a post about a figlet.el,
allowing the use of the figlet program from emacs.

Do you recall something about it ?

Thanks in advance for your help

Remy
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
       Remy AMOUROUX		     Tel    : (33)76.63.48.47
   Unite Mixte Bull-IMAG    	     Fax    : (33)76.54.76.15
Z.I de Mayencin - 2, rue Vignate     E-mail : R.A...@frgu.bull.fr
      38610 Gieres FRANCE                     or Rem...@imag.fr
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,6b7f0ac41d05bfbc,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-09 00:25:52 PST
Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!igor.rutgers.edu!rutgers!uwvax!zebu.heurikon.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail
From: Rem...@imag.fr
Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii
Subject: Question: Use of figlet in emacs?
Date: 9 Feb 1995 02:25:52 -0600
Organization: IMAG, Grenoble, France
Lines: 19
Sender: bob...@gagme.wwa.com
Approved: bob...@wwa.com
Message-ID: <3hcjig$cg...@gagme.wwa.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup rec.arts.ascii in 1995 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post